joshbyard:

Hackers Reverse-Engineer Iris-Scanning Tech, Can Print Contact Lenses That Fool Scanners

When a person scans his or her iris into a biometric system for the first time, the system turns the iris into a code consisting of about 5,000 bits of data. This code is based on about 240 points that are measured in the actual iris image, and is for all intents and purposes a unique digital analog of the iris. The actual iris image is then discarded.

The next time the person needs to authenticate himself or herself, he or she scans the iris again. The device converts this scan into an iris code as well, and the two codes are compared. If the digital codes match—within a reasonable margin of error—then identity is authenticated and access is granted.

But researchers at the Universidad Autonoma de Madrid and West Virginia University have found a way to reverse-engineer an iris image from the digital code itself using genetic algorithms—an iris image so good it can fool a biometric scanner.

Genetic algorithms are those that improve results each time they process data. Like generations of a species over time, they adapt; each iteration of the algorithm produces an iris image with an iris code that is a little more similar to the code being reconstructed. After 100-200 iterations, the algorithm generates an iris image with an iris code that is adequately similar to the original code.

..if a database containing iris codes were hacked, the hackers could construct iris images that would dupe scanners, and they would never even have to get near the actual owner of that iris.

(via Digital Iris Fakes Made with Evolving Algorithm Fool Biometric Scanners | Popular Science)

  1. pod313 reblogged this from joshbyard
  2. enigmatic-1 reblogged this from joshbyard and added:
    some James Bond biz
  3. the-dark-shriner reblogged this from joshbyard and added:
    YaY! Now I can stop living in fear of Wesley Snipes scooping out my eye and sticking it on the end of a pen.
  4. knotofdreams reblogged this from joshbyard
  5. burnum-down reblogged this from joshbyard
  6. jimmy-carrs-laugh reblogged this from futurescope
  7. saraahlynne reblogged this from kenyatta
  8. ddddarby reblogged this from emergentfutures
  9. cumulations reblogged this from emergentfutures and added:
    Oh, great. Just another biometric factor that has to be double-triple-quadruply checked.
  10. its-one-hell-of-a-ride reblogged this from kenyatta
  11. vanzelst reblogged this from emergentfutures and added:
    That’s scary… In 100 to 200 iterations? That’s quick. So (again) it all comes back to IT security technology to protect...
  12. complexitea reblogged this from emergentfutures
  13. itsdds reblogged this from emergentfutures
  14. actualfractal reblogged this from emergentfutures
  15. kevingaviria reblogged this from thenextweb
  16. fknyeahryan reblogged this from kenyatta
  17. betadad reblogged this from emergentfutures
  18. sara1990a reblogged this from emergentfutures and added:
    (via imgTumble)
  19. thefutureisnow reblogged this from kenyatta
  20. kenyatta reblogged this from emergentfutures
  21. oopsihateyou reblogged this from emergentfutures
  22. debrianaustin reblogged this from emergentfutures
  23. emergentfutures reblogged this from futurescope and added:
    Paul Higgins: Mission Impossible here we come joshbyard:
  24. willkelly reblogged this from thenextweb
  25. burntbrain reblogged this from thenextweb
  26. fyeahdeltagreen reblogged this from joshbyard
  27. barcampsarasota reblogged this from thenextweb
  28. butt-fumbler reblogged this from futurescope